helpstuff blog

Helping end-users since 1981

Post details: 54th STC Conference is over...

05/23/07

Permalink 02:25:52 pm, Categories: Conferences, STC, 592 words   English (US)

54th STC Conference is over...

What a week! The Conference Program Committee team outdid themselves, and I expect next year's conference to be even bigger and better. This year, more than 1400 people attended the conference, and the 79 exhibitors made it the biggest exhibition ever.

Some of the highlights:

[More:]

  • The board started with two days of meetings. The minutes and slides should be published within the next couple of weeks on the STC site, and if you get a chance, check them out.
  • Leadership Day, held on Sunday before the conference starts, was well attended. Executive Director Susan Burton, outgoing President Paula Berger, and incoming President Linda Oestreich all spoke.

    Every time she spoke, Susan presented the same consistent messages: the office has better technology (new phone system, new association management software, and so on). The Society has created new staff positions to better serve members: Director of Education (Lloyd Tucker), Director of Marketing and Membership (Mary Kabza), Director of Community Relations (not yet hired), Interim CFO (Doris Fee), and Interim COO (Laura Skoff).

    Several legal issues have been addressed, including the new bylaws which are so desperately needed to bring us into compliance with New York state law (where STC is incorporated).

    STC is working with the government to update the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) for "technical writer", changing the name to "technical communicator" with a more updated definition. (See From Writer to Communicator.) STC members are encouraged to talk to employers, HR personnel, and anyone else who can help spread the word. (The SOC information is used to determine salary ranges.)

    Outgoing President Paula Berger also spoke. Holly Harkness, Immediate Past President for the Atlanta Chapter, recapped Paula's talk at her new blog (Don't Call Me Tina).

    Incoming President Linda Oestreich talked about some of her plans for the next year. The organization chart has been slightly modified, with six primary groups (Governance, Communities, Communication, Business Development, Finance & Audit, and Professional Growth, which includes Outreach, Education, and Recognition).

    The breakout sessions were very popular. Lisa Pappas and I covered community technology, and we had more people than chairs for all three sessions.

  • Sunday's opening general session needed more publicity...people didn't know that it was going on. Saul Carliner talked with Ann Rockley, Dr. Michael Hughes, and Nancy Locke about their opinions on technical communication.
  • However, the exhibition opening night was a lot of fun, and it looked like everyone knew about it! There was a ribbon-cutting ceremony, which lent a certain "air" to the festivities. I wandered around a bit and caught up with some old friends...one of these days, I'll remember to eat more and talk less ;-) )
  • The Annual Meeting and Annual Forum on Monday night were interesting, to say the least. Several chapter presidents made a motion that the board consider creating a Community Funding Task Force, and the last half of the forum was all about community funding. WC Wiese, Treasurer, has already posted an email to the Presidents and Treasurers listservs, which has been repeated on some different chapter sites and on the STC Forums.

I didn't get a chance to attend many sessions...it seemed like I always needed to be somewhere else! But I've heard that several sessions overflowed their rooms (my session on wikis was one of them).

More information will be released over the next month or so. If you're interested in volunteering for anything, or if you want to know where information can be found, send me an email and I'll do what I can to help.

Comments:

Comment from: MikeStarr [Member] · http://www.writestarr.com/
In spite of the almost universal acclaim for the new DOL BLS SOC (whew... enough already with the acronyms), I have my misgivings... nowhere in the new definition does it clearly mention that somebody has to write something or be a writer. It's a core skill of our profession yet we're dropping it like a used Trojan®. I'm really afraid that omitting any reference to this core skill is going to hurt us in the long run.

Mike
Permalink 05/25/07 @ 14:52
Comment from: Char [Member]
[playing devil's advocate]

I'll have to ask Rick O'Sullivan about that, but my first opinion is that, while all writers are communicators, not all communicators are writers. The new definition allows for podcasts, videos, graphics, and so much more. For example, Patrick Hofmann (http://www.designph.com) is known as the "guru of visual instruction and wordless communication".

So while it doesn't specifically mention "writing", it does state "develop and design...", "...strong communication skills...", "...visual and auditory capabilities...". I don't think writing needs to be specified.

But this is just my opinion :-)
Permalink 05/25/07 @ 19:46
Comment from: MikeStarr [Member] · http://www.writestarr.com/
Yep, the new definition definitely encompasses all of those things including writing but what concerns me is that in the grand scheme of things if someone is searching the SOCs trying to find someone to WRITE documentation, they won't find it with this definition. I'm not saying the definition isn't a good description of the multitude of things we do... it is. I just want to make sure we don't throw out the baby with the bathwater. We seem so concerned with making sure that people understand that there's so much more to our jobs than just writing that we seem to be willing to forgo reminding them that writing is our PRIMARY core skill.
Permalink 05/26/07 @ 06:59
Comment from: MikeStarr [Member] · http://www.writestarr.com/
BTW, just to clarify, you point out "Patrick Hofmann (http://www.designph.com) is known as the "guru of visual instruction and wordless communication"."

You're right... there are many ways to communicate without writing. However, the buyers of our services don't think in those terms. They still think of the information products we develop as being written... even if they're entirely wordless like the (AFAIK) IKEA model.
Permalink 05/26/07 @ 07:05
Comment from: Char [Member]
I guess part of my problem is...do people to know to look for us as "technical writers"? If I tell someone I'm a technical writer, will they hire me as a Help author? As a website designer? As a speaker? As a trainer? I do so much more than technical writing, so I like a new title that is so much more appropriate for who I am and what I do.

I think that no matter what happens, *communication* will be key, and that's part of what STC is also working on.
Permalink 05/30/07 @ 22:24
Comment from: MikeStarr [Member] · http://www.writestarr.com/
They may not know "technical writer" but if they're looking for a writer I want them to be able to find "technical communicator". The fact that they wouldn't find "technical communicator" when they're looking for a speaker, a trainer, a website designer, help author (another term they may not know as well) etc. may make it even more problematic but those aren't what I think of as "core skills", but rather "adjunct skills".
Permalink 06/02/07 @ 11:04

Login / Register to Comment

helpstuff blog

Thoughts and more from helpstuff.com...

May 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
<<  <   >  >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Search

Misc

Syndicate this blog XML

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution