Post details: WritersUA 2007 is over...
04/03/07
WritersUA 2007 is over...
'Twas another great conference :-)
On day 3, I attended Joe Welinske and Scott Boggan's session on A Design Review of User Assistance in Microsoft Vista. I think they did a good job of presenting Vista Help's new features: the resizable Help pane, simple search as the primary navigation (no index, a minimal TOC, no advanced search), and Guided Help. They also pointed out some of the deficiencies: only Microsoft, OEMs, and corporations can use and customize Vista Help; no popups; can't view more than one Help file at a time. The only thing I think they got wrong is that the Help viewer has been ported back to Windows XP...I see it when I request Help in Office 2007.
One of the biggest changes (for me, anyway) is the new definition for "online Help", which now means "Help when there is an Internet connection". For years, "online Help" has meant any Help file. Get ready to change your mindset ;-) (Offline Help is that which is available when there isn't an Internet connection. Of course!)
The next session I went to was Dana Worley's Migrating from WinHelp to HTML Help Using Doc-To-Help. Dana spent many years creating WinHelp without a HAT, and she tested several different HATs before choosing Doc-To-Help. Her session included statistics on how well these different HATs imported her hand-coded WinHelp projects, taking into account how well the Help worked with her applications (including context-sensitive Help), formatting and appearance, TOC and index, aliases, and popups. Her handouts included charts comparing her evaluation criteria with each of the HATs that she evaluated.
Prof. Geoffrey K. Pullum, Professor of Linguistics, UC Santa Cruz, gave the closing keynote. Called Far from the Madding Gerund: Observations About Language, Pullum talked about how it's okay to split infinitives, end sentences with prepositions, and more. He also talked about Microsoft's trademark page, and how Microsoft breaks their own rules (they state, "do not use the Windows trademark in the possessive or plural form...um...isn't Windows itself a plural? They also use the possessive form of several trademarks in various supplemental pages on their site.)
At the end of the keynote, Pullum took questions, and one woman asked that he blog about the various points he discussed, addressing it to Joe (her boss). Pullam did.
Comments, Pingbacks:
What specific resources does Mr. Pullam cite to support his conclusions about the language? I note he mentions a couple of sources, but his blog is not comprehensive, and I would argue that the references to fiction writing are irrelevant.
For example, he says that English does not use the masculine as a default prounou when the sex of the referred pronoun is mixed, but one example of poor writing does not make that case. And, what of situations where the gender is unknown; does this example also apply to using a masculine pronoun for an unknown gender?
The arguments here (well, a couple are not really arguments, for example the fact that which can be restrictive is quite clear, only a rule of thumb suggests otherwise) smack of that oft-abused quote mistakenly attributed to Winston Churchill; "up with which I shall not pub."
Cheers.
Sigh. Typo (one of several).
This is not windows in your house, nor windows (dialog boxes) on your screen, Microsoft has so far been unable to trademark those.
No, this is "Microsoft Windows Software," where "Windows" is the singular name of a singular software application (okay, OS, whatever).
Thoughts?
Cheers.
Cheers.
OK, so "Windows" might not have been the best example. But if you look at their Terms of Use (http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.mspx), you'll see several places where they've used "Microsoft's" (yet their trademarks page states, don't use a Microsoft trademark in the possessive form); there are documents on the site that use the plural form of their trademarks (for example, http://www.microsoft.com/uk/office/officeessentials/marketing.mspx refers to "PowerPoints").
Thanks for the info from Prof. Pullum - I love the way linguists tweak tech communicators about language. Thanks also for the update on what's going on with tools updates, it'll help me get into gear for returning to work in June. :)
Login / Register to Comment
helpstuff blog
Thoughts and more from helpstuff.com...
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Search
Categories
Archives
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (4)
- May 2008 (4)
- April 2008 (4)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (3)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (6)
- September 2007 (6)
- August 2007 (3)
- more...